Peters projection

What is the Peters Projection Map?

Choosing among them is an exercise in values clarification: There Peters projection literally thousands of map projections. The challenge of any world map is to represent a round earth on a flat surface.

By many cartographers had turned overtly hostile to his claims. For example, Greenland will be around 13 times smaller than Africa, as it is in real life.

Although the Peters projection is not wildly popular, maps drawn using this technique can Peters projection found in some map stores, or through specialty supply companies.

Suggesting " cartographic imperialism ", Peters projection found ready audiences. Such maps promote serious, erroneous conceptions by severely distorting large sections of the world, by showing the round Earth as having straight edges and sharp corners, by representing most distances and direct routes incorrectly, and by portraying the circular coordinate system as a squared grid.

The Peters Projection is an area Peters projection map. Arno Peters, Peters did not actually invent it. This projection style could be more accurately termed a Gall-Peters projection, crediting the original Peters projection and the man who popularized it.

You can recognize a Peters projection map by the elongated shapes of the continents, and the roughly accurate depictions of area. Cartographers appeared in the "Age of Discovery", which developed into the Age of European Conquest and Exploitation and took over the task of making maps.

John Fallow actor John Billingsley explains why the President of the United States should champion the use of this map in schools, because it correctly represents the size of the countries and therefore gives due prominence to countries in less technologically developed parts of the world that are otherwise underrepresented.

In particular, Peters writes in The New Cartography, Philosophers, astronomers, historians, popes and mathematicians have all drawn global maps long before cartographers as such existed. Just twenty years earlier, for example, Trystan Edwards described and promoted his own eponymous projection, disparaging the Mercator, and recommending his projection as the solution.

Beyond the lack of novelty in the projection itself, the claims Peters made about the projection were also familiar to cartographers.

Brian Harleyhave credited the Peters phenomenon with demonstrating the social implications of map projections, at the very least. He gave it the name "orthographic" and formally published his work in in the Scottish Geographical Magazine.

The name "Gall—Peters projection" seems to have been used first by Arthur H. The first item of interest about the Peters map is that although it is named for Dr. Our goal here is to help nurture "critical thinking skills" by comparing and contrasting the Peters Map with the Mercator Map and promote the Peters Map as a supplement to traditional maps.

Inwhen Peters presented his map to the world, there was a great deal of discussion about bias, colonialism, and race issues; as a result, the media and some academics seized upon the Peters projection map as a more fair way of representing the Earth.

Ad When Peters introduced the area accurate projection to the world, he framed the map in political terms. The earth is round. While cartography might not seem like a heated field, there was actually a great deal of controversy over the Peters projection map when it was first revealed inand some of the controversy continues to this day.

The most widely displayed rectangular world map is the Mercator in fact a navigational diagram devised for nautical chartsbut other rectangular world maps proposed as replacements for the Mercator also display a greatly distorted image of the spherical Earth.

On a Mercator project, Greenland looks gigantic, totally dwarfing Africa, when in fact reality is the other way around; Peters suggested that the size difference made developing nations along the equator seem insignificant.

Robinson in a pamphlet put out by the American Cartographic Association in Arno Peters at a Press Conference in Germany in it generated a firestorm of debate.

Gall–Peters projection

Just as in the case of Peters, earlier projections generally were promoted as alternatives to the Mercator. Since much of the technologically underdeveloped world lies near the Peters projection, these countries appear smaller on a Mercator and therefore, according to Peters, seem less significant.

Comparing the Peters Map to The Mercator maps make clear that all symbols need to be carefully examined. By using his "new" projection, Peters argued that poorer, less powerful nations could be restored to their rightful proportions.

In the ensuing years, however, it became clear that Peters and his map were no flash in the pan. Other claims included "absolute angle conformality", "no extreme distortions of form", and "totally distance-factual".

The cartographic profession is, by its retention of old precepts based on the Eurocentric global concept, incapable of developing this egalitarian world map which alone can demonstrate the parity of all peoples of the earth. Each has certain strengths and corresponding weaknesses.

The Mercator projection increasingly inflates the sizes of regions according to their distance from the equator. Maps deliver messages far beyond geography. Our hope is you can introduce the Peters Map to your students.Maps not only represent the world, they shape the way we see it.

The revolutionary Peters Projection map presents countries in their true proportion to one another: it has been adopted by the UN, aid agencies, schools and businesses around the world.

The Peters Projection World Map is one of the most stimulating, and controversial, images of the world. When this map was first introduced by historian and cartographer Dr. Arno Peters at a Press Conference in Germany in it generated a firestorm of debate.

The Peters Projection World Map is an equal area projection. That means that one square inch anywhere on the map is an equal number of square miles/5(39).

Because the Earth is roughly spherical, every flat map distorts our planet one way or another. The most popular version is the Mercator projection, created by Flemish cartographer Gerardus. Proponents of the Peters projection map claim that their map is a good, fair, and non-racist view of the world.

They're comparing their map to the almost-defunct Mercator map. Unfortunately, geographers and cartographers agree that neither map projection is appropriate for use as a map of our planet.

Peters projection
Rated 5/5 based on 37 review