Make a snowflake At this point I was happy. Think beyond better ways of addressing the same research questions. For example, an artist may discuss each project and what it means separately.
What other issues and questions arise?
If it is the only thing I read, I should get a good understanding of what you found and why it matters. We started by drawing a table like this: This model could partially explain our results, including the heterogeneous micro-architecture and the decrease of signal and noise correlations with distance.
Alternatively write them in an email to someone. This is a stylistic choice — there is no right or wrong way to do it, but the diagram lets you imagine different results and discuss the implications of the various choices. What parts would it need?
We took several photos as this diagram evolved and changed to present different options. Note similarities, differences, common or different trends. What type of local connectivity might give rise to these results? State the major conclusions from your study and present the theoretical and practical implications of your study.
Previous reports of smooth tonotopic maps may have resulted from techniques that average the responses over multiple neurons.
The Ph factor is somewhat elusive and hard to describe, but basically it means you have to make some knowledge claims. You can use a couple of basic techniques to help you with this process: Well, the best way to start in my view is just to write, but perhaps start to write without the specific purpose of the discussion chapter in mind.
Summary of the entire project — this can be an extended abstract. Functional organization and population dynamics in the mouse primary auditory cortex. As tempting as it may be, avoid over-using the grammatical first person.
To further develop the snowflake, Wendy will write at least four points under each subhead, to make paragraph headings.
Relate your findings to the issues you raised in the introduction. She is a more creative person than me and was worried that she would muck around and just find more and more connections — a fair point.
It should accomplish 2 things: Although this concern has not been thoroughly ruled out, it seems unlikely because, in at least one study, GABAergic interneuorns were loaded just as efficiently as neighboring pyramidal neurons using similar methodology These neurons might be involved in something other than simple pure-tone coding, such as processing of complex sound features You should explain it to me clearly, in a narrative, without restating your results.
Finally, our data describing strong correlation between noise correlation during on-going activity and during auditory stimuli support the idea that distributed groups of interconnected neurons are coactivated during tone stimulation. Pretend your results are produced by a machine then describe the machine.
The snowflake method is a technique used by novel writers.The discussion chapter is the problem child of the thesis. The chapter most likely to provoke fear, uncertainty and doubt. Not everyone writes a chapter called “discussion”, but everyone has to do discussiony bits because, well – that’s where the creative magic of the PhD happens.
The. How to write a Discussion chapter for your thesis or dissertation I noticed that the Discussion chapter is one of the hardest to write, especially when you are so close to the results and your head is wrapped up in all the data. How do I start my discussion chapter?
January 23, · by Thesis Whisperer On Twitter this week two people asked me for advice for starting the discussion chapter of their thesis / dissertation (I’m going to use the word thesis from now on because I am Australian).
Guidelines for Writing a Thesis or Dissertation, Linda Childers Hon, Ph.D. Outline for Empirical Master’s Theses, guide but rather a general outline. Chapter 1: Purpose and Significance of the Study. Chapter 5: Discussion.
Thesis Writing in the Sciences. Intro: Lit Review; Methods; Results ; Discussion ; Scientific Style ; Writing the Discussion. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
then moves outwards to contextualize these findings in the general field. Discussing your findings. Your dissertation's discussion should tell a story, say experts. What do your data say? When he defended his master's thesis, his committee told him his conclusions went too far out on a limb.
"Conclude the general discussion with a strong paragraph stating the main point or points again, in somewhat different.Download